LEGITIMASI IDENTITAS ADAT DALAM DINAMIKA POLITIK AGRARIA (STUDI KASUS LEMBAGA SWAPRAJA DI YOGYAKARTA)

Kus Sri Antoro

doi:10.31292/jb.v1i39.182

Kus Sri Antoro Staf Pengajar pada Universitas Gunung Kidul Yogyakarta, pegiat Lembaga Tani Muda Mandiri, relawan Forum Komunikasi Masyarakat Agraris (FKMA)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v1i39.182

Keywords: agraria

Abstract

Post New Order era is marked by the rise of movements that, claiming on the behalf of the indigenous people,
attempt to take over the indigenous rights related to agrarian resources, including the feudalistic self-governing institution
(swapraja) in Yogyakarta. That the status and rights of both indigenous community (Adat) and self-governing institution have been
strictly distinguished by agrarian laws, it does not mean that the laws fully operate in social domain. In reality, the existence of
the dualistic agrarian politics is recognized although it finds no room for legal certainty. By tracing and comparing between official
historical sources, this article is critically reviewing the issue of the dynamics on indigenous community positioning in agrarian
politics in the former self-governing region of Yogyakarta, as well as further consequences of the implementation of agrarian
special authority following the issuance of Law Number 13 of 2012.

Keywords: indigenous community, self-governing institution, agrarian resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kus Sri Antoro, Staf Pengajar pada Universitas Gunung Kidul Yogyakarta, pegiat Lembaga Tani Muda Mandiri, relawan Forum Komunikasi Masyarakat Agraris (FKMA)

Universitas Gunung Kidul
Yogyakarta

References

Andaya, B.W. Political development between the
16th and 19th centuries in N. Tarling (ed)
The Cambridge history of Southeast Asia:
From c. 1500 to c.1800. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Antoro, K.S. 2010. Konflik-konflik di Kawasan
Pertambangan Pasir Besi: Studi Implikasi
Otonomi Daerah (Studi Kasus DIY). Tesis
(tidak dipublikasikan).
Arizona, Yance. 2013. Masyarakat Adat dalam
Kontestasi Pembaruan Hukum. Makalah
Seminar Pemberdayaan Sosial Komunitas
Adat: Upaya peningkatan efektivitas pemberdayaan
KAT saat ini dan pengembangan
ke depan. BAPPENAS, 15 Mei 2013.
Blaikie, P. 1985. The Polical Economy of Soil Erosion.
Longman. New York.
Davidson, James S. dan D. Henley. ‘Konservatisme
Radikal-Aneka Wajah Politik Adat’
dalam J.S.Davidson, D. Henley, S. Moniaga
(Editor). 2010. Adat dalam Politik Indonesia.
Jakarta. KITLV-Jakarta Yayasan Obor.
Escobar, A. 1998. ‘Whose Knowledge, Whose
Nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the
Political Ecology of Social Movements.’ Journal
of Political Ecology 5, 53-82.
Hirtz, F. 2003. ‘It Takes Modern Means to be Traditional:
on Recognizing Indigenous Cultural
Communities in the Philipines.’ Development
and Change, 34: 887-914.
Houben, V.J.H. 1994. Keraton and Kumpeni:
Surakarta and Yogyakarta, 1830-1870,
Leiden: KITLV Press.
Jacoby, E.H. 1961. Agrarian Unrest in Southeast
Asia. 2nd ed. London, Asia Publishing
House.
Jung, C. 2003. ‘The Politics of Indigenous Identity:
Neoliberalism, Cultural Rights, and the
Mexican Zapatistas,’ Social Research, 70:
433-62.
Klinken, Gerry van. ‘Kembalinya para Sultan:
Pentas Gerakan Komunitarian dalam Politik
Lokal’ dalam J.S.Davidson, D. Henley, S.
Moniaga (ed) . 2010. Adat dalam Politik Indonesia.
Jakarta. KITLV-Jakarta Yayasan
Obor.
Li, Tania Murray. 2007. Governmentality.
Anthropologica, 49 (2) 275-281
Luthfi, A.N., M. Nazir S., A. Tohari, Dian A.W.,
dan Diar Candra T. 2009. Keistimewaan Yogyakarta:
Yang Diingat dan Yang Dilupakan.
STPN. Yogyakarta.
Niezen, R. 2003. The Origin of Indigenism: Human Rights and The Politics of Identity, Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Peluso, N.L 2006.Hutan Kaya, Rakyat Melarat
Penguasaan Sumberdaya dan Perlawanan
di Jawa. Jakarta: Konpahlindo.
Puri, Widhiana H. 2013. ‘Kontekstualitas Aff irmative
Cction dalam Kebijakan Pertanahan
di Yogyakarta.’ Jurnal Bhumi No 37 Tahun
12, April 2013, STPN Yogyakarta, hlm 169-
180.
Ranawidjaja, U. 1955. Swapraja Sekarang dan Di
Hari Kemudian. Jakarta: Penerbit Djambatan.
Schlager, E. and E. Ostrom. 1992. Property Rights
Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conseptual
Analysis, Land Economics 68(3), p
249-262.
Shiraishi, T. 1997. Zaman Bergerak: Radikalisme
Rakyat di Jawa, 1912-1926. Jakarta: Pustaka
Utama Grafiti.
Tauchid, M. 2009. Masalah Agraria sebagai
Masalah Penghidupan dan Kemakmuran
Rakyat Indonesia. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.
Topatimasang, R. ‘Mapping as a Tool for Community
Organizing Agains Power: a
Moluccas Experience’ In Brosius, P. J et al.
(Ed.) 2005. Communities and Conservation:
Histories and Politics of Community-Based
Natural Resource Management. Rowman &
Littlefield. Lanham and Oxford.
Van Dijk, R, Prof,Dr. 1982. Pengantar Hukum
Adat Indonesia. Bandung: Sumur Bandung.