LEGITIMASI IDENTITAS ADAT DALAM DINAMIKA POLITIK AGRARIA (STUDI KASUS LEMBAGA SWAPRAJA DI YOGYAKARTA)

Kus Sri Antoro(1*)

(1) Staf Pengajar pada Universitas Gunung Kidul Yogyakarta, pegiat Lembaga Tani Muda Mandiri, relawan Forum Komunikasi Masyarakat Agraris (FKMA)
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Post New Order era is marked by the rise of movements that, claiming on the behalf of the indigenous people,
attempt to take over the indigenous rights related to agrarian resources, including the feudalistic self-governing institution
(swapraja) in Yogyakarta. That the status and rights of both indigenous community (Adat) and self-governing institution have been
strictly distinguished by agrarian laws, it does not mean that the laws fully operate in social domain. In reality, the existence of
the dualistic agrarian politics is recognized although it finds no room for legal certainty. By tracing and comparing between official
historical sources, this article is critically reviewing the issue of the dynamics on indigenous community positioning in agrarian
politics in the former self-governing region of Yogyakarta, as well as further consequences of the implementation of agrarian
special authority following the issuance of Law Number 13 of 2012.

Keywords: indigenous community, self-governing institution, agrarian resources.


Keywords


agraria

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andaya, B.W. Political development between the

th and 19th centuries in N. Tarling (ed)

The Cambridge history of Southeast Asia:

From c. 1500 to c.1800. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Antoro, K.S. 2010. Konflik-konflik di Kawasan

Pertambangan Pasir Besi: Studi Implikasi

Otonomi Daerah (Studi Kasus DIY). Tesis

(tidak dipublikasikan).

Arizona, Yance. 2013. Masyarakat Adat dalam

Kontestasi Pembaruan Hukum. Makalah

Seminar Pemberdayaan Sosial Komunitas

Adat: Upaya peningkatan efektivitas pemberdayaan

KAT saat ini dan pengembangan

ke depan. BAPPENAS, 15 Mei 2013.

Blaikie, P. 1985. The Polical Economy of Soil Erosion.

Longman. New York.

Davidson, James S. dan D. Henley. ‘Konservatisme

Radikal-Aneka Wajah Politik Adat’

dalam J.S.Davidson, D. Henley, S. Moniaga

(Editor). 2010. Adat dalam Politik Indonesia.

Jakarta. KITLV-Jakarta Yayasan Obor.

Escobar, A. 1998. ‘Whose Knowledge, Whose

Nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the

Political Ecology of Social Movements.’ Journal

of Political Ecology 5, 53-82.

Hirtz, F. 2003. ‘It Takes Modern Means to be Traditional:

on Recognizing Indigenous Cultural

Communities in the Philipines.’ Development

and Change, 34: 887-914.

Houben, V.J.H. 1994. Keraton and Kumpeni:

Surakarta and Yogyakarta, 1830-1870,

Leiden: KITLV Press.

Jacoby, E.H. 1961. Agrarian Unrest in Southeast

Asia. 2nd ed. London, Asia Publishing

House.

Jung, C. 2003. ‘The Politics of Indigenous Identity:

Neoliberalism, Cultural Rights, and the

Mexican Zapatistas,’ Social Research, 70:

-62.

Klinken, Gerry van. ‘Kembalinya para Sultan:

Pentas Gerakan Komunitarian dalam Politik

Lokal’ dalam J.S.Davidson, D. Henley, S.

Moniaga (ed) . 2010. Adat dalam Politik Indonesia.

Jakarta. KITLV-Jakarta Yayasan

Obor.

Li, Tania Murray. 2007. Governmentality.

Anthropologica, 49 (2) 275-281

Luthfi, A.N., M. Nazir S., A. Tohari, Dian A.W.,

dan Diar Candra T. 2009. Keistimewaan Yogyakarta:

Yang Diingat dan Yang Dilupakan.

STPN. Yogyakarta.

Niezen, R. 2003. The Origin of Indigenism: Human Rights and The Politics of Identity, Berkeley:

University of California Press.

Peluso, N.L 2006.Hutan Kaya, Rakyat Melarat

Penguasaan Sumberdaya dan Perlawanan

di Jawa. Jakarta: Konpahlindo.

Puri, Widhiana H. 2013. ‘Kontekstualitas Aff irmative

Cction dalam Kebijakan Pertanahan

di Yogyakarta.’ Jurnal Bhumi No 37 Tahun

, April 2013, STPN Yogyakarta, hlm 169-

Ranawidjaja, U. 1955. Swapraja Sekarang dan Di

Hari Kemudian. Jakarta: Penerbit Djambatan.

Schlager, E. and E. Ostrom. 1992. Property Rights

Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conseptual

Analysis, Land Economics 68(3), p

-262.

Shiraishi, T. 1997. Zaman Bergerak: Radikalisme

Rakyat di Jawa, 1912-1926. Jakarta: Pustaka

Utama Grafiti.

Tauchid, M. 2009. Masalah Agraria sebagai

Masalah Penghidupan dan Kemakmuran

Rakyat Indonesia. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.

Topatimasang, R. ‘Mapping as a Tool for Community

Organizing Agains Power: a

Moluccas Experience’ In Brosius, P. J et al.

(Ed.) 2005. Communities and Conservation:

Histories and Politics of Community-Based

Natural Resource Management. Rowman &

Littlefield. Lanham and Oxford.

Van Dijk, R, Prof,Dr. 1982. Pengantar Hukum

Adat Indonesia. Bandung: Sumur Bandung.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v1i39.182

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v1i39.182.g162

Article metrics

Abstract views : 101 | views : 199

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Kus Sri Antoro

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan ISSN 2580-2151 (media online)

Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional
Jurnal Bhumi dan STPN Press Lantai 2 Gedung Akademik-Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Jalan Tata Bumi NO.5, PO BOX 1216 Yogyakarta 55293

Phone: (0274) 587239
Fax: (0274) 587239

View My Stats