Is Complete Land Property Rights Increase Productivity of Rice Farming?

  • Jefri Adriansyah Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia
  • Yohanna M. Lidya Gultom Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia

Abstract

Abstract: This study examines how changes in the status of agricultural land property rights affects the productivity of rice farming, taking the case in Indonesia. By employing the two-period difference-in-differences (DiD) approach, we examine the productivity of 686 rice farming households that were covered in the IFLS longitudinal data panel survey in 2007 and 2014. IFLS itself is a survey with a sample that is considered to represent about 83 percent of the Indonesian population which was held in 13 provinces of the 34 existing provinces. The advantage of this research is the use of longitudinal data with observations on the same household and is a panel related to rice farming households. We find that changes in land property rights status from incomplete to complete property rights, has no effect on the productivity of rice farming, suggesting that to improve rice productivity, the government can not relying solely on land registration program. In Indonesia, land registration program solely implemented on land that is dispute free, therefore, there is no significant impact on creating maximization behaviour in input of production that can increase productivity.

Keywords: Asset legality, difference-in-differences analysis, land status, maximization behavior transferability

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  • Ahmed, M., & Billah, M. (2018). “Impact of sharecropping on rice productivity in some areas of Khulna District”. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 43 (3), 417–430.
  • Aldillah, R. (2016). “Kinerja pemanfaatan mekanisasi pertanian dan implikasinya dalam upaya percepatan produksi pangan di Indonesia”. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 34 (2), 163-177.
  • Bellemare, M. F. (2013). “The productivity impacts of formal and informal land rights: Evidence from Madagascar”. Land Economics, 89(2), 272–290. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3368/le.89.2.272.
  • Besley, T. (1995). “Property rights and investment incentives: Theory and evidence from Ghana”. Journal of Political Economy, 103 (5), 903–937.
  • Chen, C. (2017). “Untitled land, occupational choice, and agricultural productivity”. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 9(4), 91-121.
  • Chen, C., & Restuccia, D. (2017). “Land markets, resource allocation, and agricultural productivity”. Paper Ra¨ul Santaeul`alia-Llopis MOVE, UAB, and Barcelona GSE.
  • Cordoba, G. I. F. (2017). “Land property rights and agricultural productivity: Evidence from Panama”. Discussion Paper, 67, 1-25.
  • de Moura, M. J. S. B., & da Silveira Bueno, R. D. L. (2013). “Land title program in Brazil: Are there any changes to happiness?”. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 45, 196–203.
  • Feder, G., & Feeny, D. (1991). “Land tenure and property rights: Theory and implications for development policy”. The World Bank Economic Review, 5 (1), 135–153.
  • Galiani, S, & Sened, I. (Eds.) (2014). Institutions, property rights, and economic growth: The legacy of Douglass North. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. J. (2016). Impact evaluation in practice, Second Edition. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank and World Bank.
  • Ghebru, H. & Holden, S. T. (2015). “Technical efficiency and productivity differential effects of land right certification: A quasi-experimental evidence”. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 54, 1-31.
  • Groenewegen, J., Spithoven, A. H. G. M., & Berg, AVD. (2010). Institutional economics: An introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Holcombe, R. G. (2014). “The economic theory of rights”. Journal of Institutional Economics, 10 (3), 471–491. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000137.
  • Hombrados, J. G., Devisscher, M., & Herreros, M.M. (2015). “The impact of land titling on agricultural production and agricultural investments in Tanzania: A theory-based approach”. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1–15.
  • Kadapatti, R. G., & Bagalkoti, S. T. (2014). “Small farms and agricultural productivity-a macro analysis”. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 2 (3), 123–135.
  • Kassa, W. (2014). “Land titling and investment in Tanzania: An empirical investigation”. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-18.
  • Koirala, K. H., Mishra, A. & Mohanty, S. (2016). “Impact of land ownership on productivity and efficiency of rice farmers: The case of the Philippines”. Land Use Policy, 50, 371-378.
  • Kubitza, C. et al. (2018). “Land property rights, agricultural intensification, and deforestation in Indonesia”. Ecological Economics, 147, 312–321. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.021.
  • Lawin, K. G., & Tamini, L.D. (2019). “Tenure security and farm efficiency analysis correcting for biases from observed and unobserved variables: Evidence from Benin”. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70 (1), 116–134.
  • Lawry, S., Samii, C., Hall, R., Leopold, A., Hornby, D., & Mtero, F. (2017). “The impact of land property rights interventions on investment and agricultural productivity in developing countries: A systematic review”. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 9 (1), 61–81.
  • Libecap, G. D. (2007). “The assignment of property rights on the western frontier: Lessons for contemporary environmental and resource policy”. The Journal of Economic History, 67 (02), 257-291.
  • Mahananto, et al. (2009). “Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi produksi padi: Studi kasus di Kecamatan Nogosari, Boyolali, Jawa Tengah”. WACANA, 12 (1), 179–191.
  • Mello, M. T. L. (2016). “Property rights and the ways of protecting entitlements - an interdisciplinary approach”. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, 20 (3), 430–457. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1590/198055272033.
  • Newman, C., et al. (2015). “Property rights and productivity: The case of joint land titling in Vietnam”. Land Economics, 91(1), 91-105. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3368/le.91.1.91.
  • Payne, G., Durand-Lasserve, A., & Rakodi, C. (2009). “Social and economic impacts of land titling programs in urban and peri urban areas: A short review of the literature”. Urban Land Markets.
  • Pender, J., Nkonya, E., Jagger, P., Serunkuma, D. & Sali, H. (2004). “Strategies to increase agricultural productivity and reduce land degradation: Evidence from Uganda”. Agricultural Economics, 31, 181–195.
  • Pochanasomboon, A, et al. (2020). “Impacts of land ownership on the economic performance and viability of rice farming in Thailand”. Land, 9 (71). DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.3390/land9030071.
  • Sen, A. (1964). “Size of holdings and productivity”. Annual Number, 323–326.
  • Uchezuba, D., Amaambo, P. & Mbai, S. (2019). "Tenure security, investment and the productivity of agricultural farms in the communal area of Kavango West Region of Namibia: Any evidence of causality?”, 93rd Annual Conference, April 15-17, 2019, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 289585, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
  • Udry, C. (2012). The Oxford companion to the economics of Africa, Chapter Land Tenure, 410–415. Oxford University Press.
  • CROSSMARK
    Published
    2023-01-04
    DIMENSIONS
    How to Cite
    Adriansyah, J., & Gultom, Y. M. L. (2023). Is Complete Land Property Rights Increase Productivity of Rice Farming?. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 8(2), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v8i2.536