Rice Farmers’ Agrarian Dynamics, a Historical Perspective

  • Ahmad Choibar Tridakusumah Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Adi Nugraha Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Iwan Setiawan Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Ganjar Kurnia Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran


Abstract: As the staple food of Indonesians, rice has become an economic and political commodity in the country. This study aims to analyze the agrarian dynamics of rice farmers from a historical perspective, focusing on studying how the agrarian change affected the rice production mode in the present situation. The historiography approach used to produce critical analysis was complemented by tracing literature studies, especially in West Java, one of the main rice producers in Indonesia. The results showed that the structure of land tenure and ownership in rice farming had undergone a fundamental change. The dynamics that appear in rice can be seen at the level of agricultural technology intervention and local and national policies, which have experienced changes due to pressure from the agricultural production input sub-system. This pressure led to a change in peasant institutions that shifted from informal to formal, which was not in line with the structure of land tenure and ownership, which was still dominated by petty commodity producers.

Keywords: Agrarian dynamics, farmers, historical, paddy


Download data is not yet available.


  • Adiwilaga, A. (1975). “Beberapa catatan tentang penulisan sejarah Java Barat sekitar permasalahannya.” Sejarah/EZWa BaratI Sebz Zar Perma? AZahan ?? a, Edited by Atja 5272.
  • Altemeier, K, Steven R.T, & Daris, N. (1991). “Modelling policy options in the Indonesian agricultural sector.” Applied Economics, 23(3), 435–46.
  • Appadurai, A. (1988). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bernstein, H. (2015). “Some reflections on agrarian change in China.” Journal of Agrarian Change 15(3), 454–77.
  • Bernstein, H. (2016). “Agrarian political economy and modern world capitalism: The contributions of food regime analysis.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 43(3), 611–47. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1101456.
  • Clapp, J. (2016). Food. London: Polity Press.
  • Clapp, J. (2017). “Food self-sufficiency: Making sense of it, and when it makes sense.” Food Policy ,66, 88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.001.
  • Cottyn, H.D.G.J., & Vanhaute, E. (2016). “The great commodification and its paradoxes. A historical, comparative and global perspective on land regimes and land reforms.” P. 1 in Global governance and agrarian justice: Global governance/politics, climate justice & agrarian/social justice. An international colloquium. York.
  • Cova, V., Julien, B., Cylvie, C., & Asim, Q.S. (2019). “The changing dichotomy between the sacred and the profane: A historical analysis of the Santiago de Compostela Pilgrimage.” Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 16(1), 109–30.
  • Creswell, J.W., & Cheryl, N.P. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
  • Czy?ewski, B., Matuszczak,A. & Mi?kiewicz, R.L. (2019). “Public goods versus the farm price-cost squeeze: Shaping the sustainability of the EU’s common agricultural policy.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(1), 82–102.
  • De Filippi, P., & Vieira, M.S. (2014). “The commodification of information commons: The case of cloud computing.” Colum. Sci. & Tech. L. Rev. 16:102.
  • Ekadjati, E.S. (2006). Nu Maranggung Dina Sajarah Sunda. Kiblat Buku Utama.
  • Ekadjati, S. n.d.. Kebudayaan Sunda zaman Pajajaran.”
  • Fuglie, K.O. (2004). “Productivity growth in Indonesian agriculture, 1961–2000.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studie,s 40(2), 209–25.
  • Goodwin, G. (2021). “Fictitious commodification and agrarian change: Indigenous peoples and land markets in Highland Ecuador.” Journal of Agrarian Change, 21(1), 3–24.
  • Hardjasaputra, A.S. (2005). “Ngahuma: Suatu pola pertanian tradisional di Jawa Barat tinjauan sejarah.” Jurnal Universitas Padjadjaran Fakultas Sastra Jurusan Ilmu Sejarah.
  • Hazell, P.B.R. (2009). The Asian Green Revolution, 911, Intl Food Policy Res Inst.
  • Hudayana, B. (2020). “The impact of land commodification on small and landless farmer’s access to rent land in the Sub-Urban village.” BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan 6(2), 262–76.
  • Iskandar, J., & Iskandar, B.S. (2016). “Etnoekologi dan pengelolaan agroekosistem oleh penduduk Desa Karangwangi Kecamatan Cidaun, Cianjur Selatan Jawa Barat.” Jurnal Biodjati 1(1), 1–12.
  • Jane, E.A., & Barker, C. (2016). “Cultural studies: Theory and practice.” Cultural Studies, 1–760.
  • Jayne, T. S., Chamberlin, J., Holden, S., Ghebru, H., Ricker-Gilbert, J. & Place, F. (2021). “Rising land commodification in Sub-Saharan Africa: Reconciling the diverse narratives.” Global Food Security, 30, 100565. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100565.
  • Kartodirdjo, S., 1984. Pemberontakan Petani Banten. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
  • Kurnia, G., Setiawan, I., Tridakusumah,A.C, Jaelani, G., Heryanto, M.A, Nugraha, A. (2022). “Local wisdom for ensuring agriculture sustainability: A case from Indonesia.” Sustainability 14 (14), 8823. doi: 10.3390/su14148823.
  • Larastiti, C. (2018). “Sonor dan bias ‘cetak sawah’ di lahan gambut.” BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 4(1), 67–87.
  • Leksana, G. (2019). “Ketimpangan dan kontinuitas patronase dalam lintasan sejarah: Menelusuri sejarah perubahan agraria di Malang Selatan.” BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 5(1), 54–68.
  • Lind, D & Barham, E. (2004). “The social life of the Tortilla: Food, cultural politics, and contested commodification.” Agriculture and Human Values, 21(1), 47–60.
  • Lombart, D. (2008). “Nusa Jawa: Silang budaya kajian sejarah terpadu, Part 1: Batas-batas Pembaratan.” FT Gamedia Pustaka Utama, Forum Jakarta Paris, Ecole ….
  • Lubis, N.H. (1998). Kehidupan kaum Ménak Priangan, 1800-1942. Pusat Informasi Kebudayaan Sunda.
  • McCarl, Bruce A., D. Adams, R. Alig, G. Cornforth, & G. Latta. 2007. “Agriculture in the climate change and energy price squeeze.” in The Fourth USDA Greenhouse Gas Conference.
  • McCarl, B, & Reilly, J. (2006). “Agriculture in the climate change and energy price squeeze: Part 2: Mitigation Opportunities.” Manuscript, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M, College Station, Texas.
  • McMichael, P. (2009). “A food regime genealogy.” The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 139–69.
  • McMichael, P. (2013). Food regimes and agrarian questions. Fernwood Publishing Halifax.
  • McMichael, P. (2015). “Value theory and food regime temporalities.” Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 38(4), 307–28.
  • Moore, J.W. (2016). Anthropocene or capitalocene?: Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. Pm Press.
  • Moreda, T. (2018). “Contesting conventional wisdom on the links between land tenure security and land degradation: Evidence from Ethiopia.” Land Use Policy 77, 75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.058.
  • Moss, C.B. (1992). “The cost-price squeeze in agriculture: An application of cointegration.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 14(2), 205–13.
  • Mulyani, L. (2018). “Review buku ‘kolonialisme dan kapitalisme: Fenomena global yang terus berulang dalam proses perubahan agraria.’” BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 4(2), 266–77.
  • Newsome, L. (2020). “Beyond ‘get big or get out’: Female farmers’ responses to the cost-price squeeze of Australian agriculture.” Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 57–64.
  • Nugraha, A. (2015). “An ethnography study of farming style in Gianyar, Bali, Indonesia.” Wageningen University, Wageningen.
  • Nugraha, A., Mochamad S.H., & Supyandi, D. (2016). “Refleksi paradigma kedaulatan pangan di Indonesia: Studi kasus gerakan pangan lokal di Flores Timur.” Agricore: Jurnal Agribisnis dan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Unpad, 1(2).
  • Owen, W.F. (1966). “The double developmental squeeze on agriculture.” The American Economic Review, 56(1/2), 43–70.
  • Pham, V.C., Pham, T., Tong, T.H.A., Nguyen, T.T.H, & Pham, N.H. (2015). “The conversion of agricultural land in the peri-urban areas of Hanoi (Vietnam): Patterns in space and time.” Journal of Land Use Science, 10(2), 224–42.
  • Purnami, S.A.A., & Santini, M.N. (2017). “The impact of population growth to the agricultural land conversion and sustainability of Subak as world cultural heritage.” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 22(8), 13–18.
  • Rondhi, M., Pratiwi, P.A., Handini,V.T, Sunartomo, A.F, & Budiman, S.A. (2018). “Agricultural land conversion, land economic value, and sustainable agriculture: A case study in East Java, Indonesia.” Land 7(4), 148.
  • Setiawan, I., Supyandi, D., Rasiska, S. & Judawinata, M.G. 2018. Pertanian Postmodern. Penebar Swadaya Grup.
  • Su, S., Xiao, R., & Zhang, Y. (2012). “Multi-scale analysis of spatially varying relationships between agricultural landscape patterns and urbanization using geographically weighted regression.” Applied Geography, 32(2), 360–75.
  • Vandenbroeck, E. (2019). “Food: To feed or to profit?:(De) commodification in the food system and community supported agriculture.”
  • Vanhaute, E. (2011). “From famine to food crisis: What history can teach us about local and global subsistence crises.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 38(1), 47–65.
  • Vivero-Pol, J.L. (2017). “Food as commons or commodity? Exploring the links between normative valuations and agency in food transition.” Sustainability 9(3), 442.
  • Vivero-Pol, J.L. (2017). “The idea of food as commons or commodity in academia. A systematic review of english scholarly texts.” Journal of Rural Studies 53, 182–201.
  • Wallace, A.R. (1962). The Malay archipelago: The land of the orang-utan and the bird of paradise; a narrative of travel, with studies of man and nature. Courier Corporation.
  • Welker, M. (2012). “The green revolution’s ghost: Unruly subjects of participatory development in rural Indonesia: Green revolution’s ghost.” American Ethnologist 39(2), 389–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01371.x.
  • Wertheim, W.F. (1959). “The Indonesian town: Studies in urban sociology.” Ekistics 7(41), 238–41.
  • Wiggins, D. (1998). Needs, values, truth: Essays in the philosophy of value. 6. Oxford University Press.
  • Wiradi, G. (1986). Kepenguasaan tanah dalam perspektif transformasi struktural.
  • Zerbe, N. (2018). “Food as a commodity.” 155–70 in Routledge Handbook of Food as a Commons. Routledge.
    How to Cite
    Tridakusumah, A. C., Nugraha, A., Setiawan, I., & Kurnia, G. (2023). Rice Farmers’ Agrarian Dynamics, a Historical Perspective. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 8(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v8i2.531