Socio-Ecological Vulnerability Assessment and the Resulting in Spatial Pattern: A Case Study of Semarang City
Keywords:
socio-ecological system, spatial pattern, vulnerability assessment
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine the socio-ecological vulnerability and the resulting in spatial pattern on a city scale. The assessment methods for vulnerability-resilience in the social and ecological have been broadly examined, such as the Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI) and disaster risk assessment by the BNPB (Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Nasional). However, in some cases, these methods are suitable only in disastrous vulnerability and on a larger scale. The assessment method of socio-ecological systems in this paper has been modified to a city-scale and per the data availability. By using spatial data, this paper analyses the connection between vulnerability-resilience of socio-ecological systems and land coverage pattern. Based on the case study, the finding shows that almost 28% of Semarang city areas are socio-ecologically vulnerable. Mostof the land use of the vulnerable areas is currently used for urban built-up area and agriculture. For future research, this method can be used for vulnerability assessment of the socio-ecological system in other cities and as a consideration for decision making in spatial planning.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Azizul, MF 2016, Sense shaping place: interaction of planning actor’s values in social- ecological resilience: case study of urbanizing coastal rural communities in Pontian, The University of Auckland, Malaysia.
Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana 2012, Peraturan Kepala Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana Nomor 02 Tahun 2012 tentang Pedoman Umum Pengkajian Risiko Bencana.
Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana 2016, Risiko Bencana Indonesia.
Badan Pusat Statistik 2010, Peraturan Kepala Badan Pusat Statistik Nomor 37 Tahun 2010 tentang Klasifikasi Perkotaan dan Perdesaan atas desa/kelurahan di Indonesia.
Beroya-Eitner, MA 2016, 'Ecological vulnerability indicators', Ecological Indicators, 60, pp. 329–334, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.001.
Choudhary, K., Boori, MS & Kupriyanov, A 2018, 'Spatial modelling for natural and environmental vulnerability through remote sensing and GIS in Astrakhan, Russia', Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 21(2), pp. 139–147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2017.05.003.
De Chazal, J et al. 2008, Including multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio-ecological systems. Global Environmental Change, 18, pp. 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.04.005.
De Lange, HJ et al. 2010, Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment - a review and perspectives. Science of the Total Environment, 408(18), pp. 3871–3879, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.009
Grigio, AM et al. 2006, Use of remote sensing and geographical information system in the determination of the natural and environmental vulnerability of the municipal district of Guamare - Rio Grande do Norte - Northeast of Brazil. Journal of Coastal Research, 3(August), pp. 1427–1431.
Handayani, W & Rudiarto, I 2014, 'Dynamics of urban growth in Semarang metropolitan – Central Java?: an examination based on built-up area and population change', Journal of Geography and Geology, 6(4), pp. 80–87, https://doi.org/10.5539/jgg.v6n4p80.
Kementrian Pertanian 1980, Surat Keputusan Menteri Pertanian Nomor?: 837/Kpts/Um/11/1980 tentang Kriteria dan Tata Cara Penetapan Hutan Lindung.
Kumala Dewi, N & Rudiarto, I 2014, 'Pengaruh konversi lahan terhadap kondisi lingkungan di wilayah peri-urban kota Semarang (studi kasus?: area berkembang kecamatan Gunungpati)', Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Kota, 10(2), pp. 115–126.
Muttarak, R & Lutz, W 2017, Is education a key to reducing vulnerability to natural disasters and hence unavoidable climate change? WU Institutional Repository, October.
Ostrom, E 2009, A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Special Section Sciencemag.Org 325, 323(January), pp. 85–89, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226338.
Pratt, Kaly, & Mitchell 2004, Manual: How to Use the Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI). 60, http://islands.unep.ch/EVI Manual.pdf.
Setyowati, DL 2008, 'Iklim mikro dan kebutuhan ruang terbuka hijau di kota Semarang', Jurnal Manusia Dan Lingkungan, 15(3), pp. 125–140.
UNEP 2003, Assessing Human Vulnerability to Environmental Change.
Zou, T & Yoshino K 2017, Environmental vulnerability evaluation using a spatial principal components approach in the Daxing’anling region, China. Ecological Indicators, 78, pp. 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.039
Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana 2012, Peraturan Kepala Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana Nomor 02 Tahun 2012 tentang Pedoman Umum Pengkajian Risiko Bencana.
Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana 2016, Risiko Bencana Indonesia.
Badan Pusat Statistik 2010, Peraturan Kepala Badan Pusat Statistik Nomor 37 Tahun 2010 tentang Klasifikasi Perkotaan dan Perdesaan atas desa/kelurahan di Indonesia.
Beroya-Eitner, MA 2016, 'Ecological vulnerability indicators', Ecological Indicators, 60, pp. 329–334, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.001.
Choudhary, K., Boori, MS & Kupriyanov, A 2018, 'Spatial modelling for natural and environmental vulnerability through remote sensing and GIS in Astrakhan, Russia', Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 21(2), pp. 139–147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2017.05.003.
De Chazal, J et al. 2008, Including multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio-ecological systems. Global Environmental Change, 18, pp. 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.04.005.
De Lange, HJ et al. 2010, Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment - a review and perspectives. Science of the Total Environment, 408(18), pp. 3871–3879, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.009
Grigio, AM et al. 2006, Use of remote sensing and geographical information system in the determination of the natural and environmental vulnerability of the municipal district of Guamare - Rio Grande do Norte - Northeast of Brazil. Journal of Coastal Research, 3(August), pp. 1427–1431.
Handayani, W & Rudiarto, I 2014, 'Dynamics of urban growth in Semarang metropolitan – Central Java?: an examination based on built-up area and population change', Journal of Geography and Geology, 6(4), pp. 80–87, https://doi.org/10.5539/jgg.v6n4p80.
Kementrian Pertanian 1980, Surat Keputusan Menteri Pertanian Nomor?: 837/Kpts/Um/11/1980 tentang Kriteria dan Tata Cara Penetapan Hutan Lindung.
Kumala Dewi, N & Rudiarto, I 2014, 'Pengaruh konversi lahan terhadap kondisi lingkungan di wilayah peri-urban kota Semarang (studi kasus?: area berkembang kecamatan Gunungpati)', Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Kota, 10(2), pp. 115–126.
Muttarak, R & Lutz, W 2017, Is education a key to reducing vulnerability to natural disasters and hence unavoidable climate change? WU Institutional Repository, October.
Ostrom, E 2009, A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Special Section Sciencemag.Org 325, 323(January), pp. 85–89, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226338.
Pratt, Kaly, & Mitchell 2004, Manual: How to Use the Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI). 60, http://islands.unep.ch/EVI Manual.pdf.
Setyowati, DL 2008, 'Iklim mikro dan kebutuhan ruang terbuka hijau di kota Semarang', Jurnal Manusia Dan Lingkungan, 15(3), pp. 125–140.
UNEP 2003, Assessing Human Vulnerability to Environmental Change.
Zou, T & Yoshino K 2017, Environmental vulnerability evaluation using a spatial principal components approach in the Daxing’anling region, China. Ecological Indicators, 78, pp. 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.039
CROSSMARK
Published
2021-02-02
DIMENSIONS
How to Cite
Faniza, V., & Pradoto, W. (2021). Socio-Ecological Vulnerability Assessment and the Resulting in Spatial Pattern: A Case Study of Semarang City. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v5i3.396
Section
Articles
