Meninjau Kembali Teorisasi Mengenal Desentralisasi, Community Driven Delevopment, dan Kapitalisasi Agraria

  • Noer Fauzi Rachman
Keywords: Decentralization, Community Driven Development (CDD), capitalism, space of contestation and negotiation, social movement.

Abstract

Abstract: The article shows a theoretical debate on the consequence of decentralization policy and Community Driven Development (CDD) especially in relation to the way capitalism develop. The decentralization policy reshapes local government bureaucracy more responsive and accountable toward people’s needs, and the CDD facilitate rural and urban communities to manage collectively efforts to eradicating their poverty condition. Both are promoted by neo-institutionalist thinking in the World Bank and Civil Society within the same interlocking direction. Furthermore, I explicate critiques toward theory and practice of decentralization policy and CDD, launched by Vedi Hadiz, Toby Carroll, Tania Li, and Frederich Rawski. I connect those with the theorization of the ways capitalism develop as articulated by Paul Cammack, Michael Perelman, Massimo de Angelis and David Harvey. I argue that the presence of space of struggle, contestation and negotiation open the possibility for multiple forces to participate, or refuse to participate, to reshape the practice of decentralization and CDD, and furthermore the forces dialectically are reshaped because of their struggle, contestation and negotiation.

Intisari: Artikel ini mengemukakan debat teori dari konsekuensi kebijakan desentralasi dan Pembangunan Berbasis Masyarakat (CDD) terutama dalam hubungannya dengan bagaimana kapitalisme berkembang. Kebijakan desentralisasi telah membentuk pemerintah lokal menjadi lebih responsif dan akuntabel terhadap kebutuhan masyarakat, dan CDD telah memfasilitasi komunitas perkotaan maupun perdesaan untuk secara kolektif berusaha mengatasi kondisi kemiskinannya. Selanjutnya, penulis mengutarakan kritik terhadap teori dan praktik kebijakan desentralisasi dan CDD, yang dikemukakan oleh Vedi Hadiz, Toby Carroll, Tania Li dan Frederich Rawski. Penulis juga menghubungkan teori tersebut dengan teorisasi tentang bagaimana kapitalisme berkembang seperti yang dikemukakan oleh Paul Cammack, Michael Perelman, Massimo de Angelis dan David Harvey. Penulis berpendapat bahwa keberadaan ruang pertarungan, kontestasi dan negosiasi membuka kemungkinan untuk berbagai kekuatan untuk berpartisipasi, atau menolak untuk berpartisipasi, untuk membentuk kembali praktik desentralisasi dan CDD, dan selanjutnya kekuatan dialektika dibentuk kembali karena usaha, kontestasi dan negosiasi mereka.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akhmadi, Asri Yusrina, Sri Budiyati, dan Athia Yumna. 2010. “Access to Justice: Empowering Female Heads of Household in Indonesia. Case Studies in Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam, West Java, West Kalimantan, and East Nusa Tenggara” Jakarta: Lembaga Penelitian SMERU, 2010. http://www.smeru.or.id/sites/default/files/publication/accesstojustice.pdf (aksesterakhir27April2018).

Antlov, Hans. 2004. “The Making of Democratic Local Governance in Indonesia.” in Democracy, Globalization and Decentralization in Southeast Asia, edited by F. L. K. Wah, and Joakim Öjendal. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.

Ashman, Sam and Alex Callinicos. 2006. “Capital Accumulation and the State System: Assessing david Harvey’s The New Imperialism.” Historical Materialism 14:107-131.

Aspinall, Edward. 2004. “Indonesia: Civil Society and Democratic Breakthrough.” Pp. 61-96 in Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space, edited by M. Alagappa. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Brenner, Robert. 2006. “What Is and What Is Not, Imperialism?” Historical materialism 14:79-105.

Cammack, Paul. 2001a. “Making Poverty Work.” in Socialist register 2002: A World of Contradictions, edited by L. Panitch and C. Leys. London: Merlin Press.

—. 2001b. “Making the Poor Work for Globalization.” New Political Economy6:397-408.

—. 2002. “Attacking The Poor.” New Left Review13:125-134.

—. 2003. “The Governance of Global Capitalism: A New Materialist Perspective.” Historical Materialism 11:37-59.

—. 2004. “What the World Bank Means by Poverty Reduction, and Why It Matters.” New Political Economy 9:189-211.

Caroll, Toby. 2006. “The World Bank’s Socio-institutional Neoliberalism: A Case Study from Indonesia.” in The Workshop on the World Bank, Lee Kwan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore. Singapore.

Carroll, Toby. 2005. “Efficiency of What and for Whom? The Theoretical Underpinnings of the Post-Washington Concensus’ Socio-Institutional Neoliberalism.” in Working Paper No. 122. Perth: Murdoch University.

—. 2006. “The World Bank’s Socio-institutional Neoliberalism: A Case Study from Indonesia.” in The Workshop on the World Bank, Lee Kwan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore. Singapore.

Castree, Noer. 2006. “David Harvey’s Symptomatic Silence.” Historical materialism 14:35-57.

Clifford, James, and George Marcus (eds), 1986, Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Los Angeles & Berkeley: University of California Press.

Cook, 2005, “Positionality/Situated Knowledge”, dalam D. Atkinson et.al. (eds.), Cultural Geography: A Critical Dictionary of Key Concepts halaman 16-26, London: I.B. Tauris.

Craigh, David and Doug Porter. 2006. Development Beyond Neoliberalism? Governance, Poverty Reduction and Political Economy. London: Routledge.

Cribb, Robert. 1990. “The Indonesian Killings 1965-1966.” Clayton: Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University.

—. 2001. “Genocide in Indonesia 1965-1966.” Journal of Genocide Research 3:219-239.

Crook, Richard and James Manor. 2000. Democratic Decentralization. OECD Working Paper Series. Washington, DC.: The World Bank.

De Angelis, Massimo. 2001. “ Marx and Primitive Accumulation: The Continuous Character of Capital’s ‘Enclosures’.” The Commoner 2 (September) (available at www.thecommoner.org).

—. 2004. “Separating the Doing and the Deed: Capital and the Continuous Character of Enclosures.” Historical Materialism12:57-87.

—. 2007. The Begining of History. Vaule Struggles and Global Capital. London: Pluto Press.

Engel, Susan. 2006. “Where to Neoliberalism? The World Bank and the Post-National Washington Consensus in Indonesia and Vietnem.” in the 16th Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia. Wollongong, 26 - 29 June 2006.

Fauzi, Noer dan R. Yando Zakaria 2001, Mensiasati Otonomi Daerah, Panduan Fasilitasi Pengakuan dan Pemulihan Hak-hak Rakyat, Yogyakarta: Insist Press bekerjasama dengan Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria.

__. 2002 “Democratizing Decentralization: Local Initiatives from Indonesia”. Paper submitted for the International Association for the Study of Common Property 9th Biennial Conference, Zimbabwe, 2002. http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/documents/dir0/00/00/08/18/dlc-00000818-01/fauzin170502.pdf .

Farid, Hilmar. 2005a. “Indonesia’s Original Sin: Mass Killings and Capitalist Expansion, 1965-66.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies6:3-16.

______. (2005b) The class question in Indonesian social sciences. V. R. Hadiz and D. Dhakidae (editors) Social science and power in Indonesia (pp. 167-195) Jakarta: Equinox Pub. And Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Fine, Ben. 2006. “Debating the ‘New’ Imperialism.” Historical Materialism14:133-156.

Foucault, Michael. 1994. On the genealogy of ethics. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics, subjectivity and truth, Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984, Volume I (pp. 253-280). New York: The New Press.

Goldman, Michael. 2005a. Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Strugle for Social Justice in the Age of Globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale Uniersity Press.

—. 2005b. “Tracing the Roots/Routes of World Bank Power.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 25:10-29.

Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections form the Prision Notebook, edited and translated by Quintin Hoare & Goffrey Nowell Smith, Lawrence and Wishart, London.

Griffin, Penny. 2006. “The World Bank.” New Political Economy 11:571-581.

Guggenheim, Scott, Tatag Wiranto, Yogana Prasta, and Susan Wong. 2004. “Indonesia’s Kecamatan Development Program: A Large-Scale Use of Community Development to Reduce Poverty.” in Scaling Up Poverty Reduction: A Global Learning Processes and Conference. Shanghai.

Hadiz, R. Vedi and Richard Robison. 2005. “Neo-liberal Reforms and Illiberal Consolidations: The Indonesia Paradox.” teh journal of Development Studies 41:220-241.Hadiz, Vedi. 2004a. “Decentralisation and Democracy in Indonesia: A Critique of Neo-Institutionalist Perpectives.” Development and Change 35:697-718.

—. 2004b. “Indonesian Local Party Politics: A Site of Resistance to Neo-Liberal Reform.” Critical Asian Studies 36:615-636.

Hall, Stuart. 2003. “Marx’s Notes on Method: A “Reading” Of the “1857 Introduction”.”

Haraway, Donna, 1988, “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and Privilege of Partial Perspective”, dalam Feminist Studies 14, p.575-99.

Hartsock, Nancy, 1987, “The Feminist Standpoint” dalam Sandra Harding (ed.), Feminism and Methodology, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Hart, Gillian. 2001: Development Debates in the 1990s: Culs de sac and Promising Paths. Progress in Human Geography 25, 605–14.

__.2006. “Denaturalizing Dispossession: Critical Ethnography in the Age of Resurgent Imperialism.” Antipode38:977-1004.

Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—. 2004. “The ‘New’ Imperialism: Accumulation by Disposession.” in Socialist Register 2004, edited by L. Panitch and C. Leys. New York: Monthly Review Press.

—. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

—. 2006a. “Comment on Commentaries.” Historical Materialism 14:157-166.

—. 2006b. Space of Global Capitalism: Toward a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. London: Verso.—. 2006c. Spaces of Global Capitalism. London: Verso.

Hofman, Bert and Kai Kaiser. 2002. “The Making of the Big Bang and its Aftermath, A Political Economy Perspective.” Paper presented at the conference “Can Decentralization Help Rebuild Indonesia?” The International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta. http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/LearningProgram/Decentralization/Hofman2.pdf Last accesed on 07/08/2009.

Jessop, Bob. 1982. The Capitalist State. New York: New York University Press.

Lefebvre, Hendry. 1974/1991. The Production of Space. D. Nicholson-Smith (translator), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Li, Tania. 2006. “Neoliberal Strategies of Government Through Community: The Social Development Program of the World Bank in Indonesia.” in International Law and Justice Working Papers. New York: Institute for International Law and Justice, New York University School of Law.

Manor, James. 1999. The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization. Washington, DC.: The World Bank.

Mansuri, Ghazala and Vijayendra Rao. 2004. “Community-Based and -Driven Development: A Critical Review.” The World Bank Research Obserer 19:1-39.

Menko Kesra 2008. Pedoman Umum PNPM Mandiri. Jakarta: Kementerian Kordinator Kesejahteraan Rakyat.

Mohan, Giles and Stokke, Kristian. 2000.. Participatory development and empowerment: the dangers of localism. Third World Quarterly, 21(2):247-268.

Pender, John. 2001. “From ‘Structural Adjustment’ to ‘Comprehensive Development Framework’: Conditionality Transformed?” Third World Quarterly 22:397-411.

PEKKA. (2014). “Menguak Keberadaan dan Kehidupan Perempuan Kepala Keluarga”. Laporan Hasil Sistem Pemantauan Kesejahteraan Berbasis Komunitas (SPKBK-PEKKA). Jakarta: Lembaga Penelitian SMERU.

https://www.pekka.or.id/documents/Buku-1.pdf (akses terahir pada 27 April 2018)

https://www.pekka.or.id/documents/Buku2.pdf (akses terahir pada 27 April 2018)

Perelman, Michael. 2000. The Invention of Capitalism: Classical Political Economy and the Secret History of Primitive Accumulation. Durham: Duke University Press.

Rawski, Frederick. 2005. “World Bank Community-Driven Development Programming in Indonesia and East Timor: Implications for the Study of Administrative Law.” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 37:919-951.

Robison, Richard and Vedi R. Hadiz. 2004. Reorganizing Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. London: Routledge.

Scott, David. 1995. “Colonial Governmentality.” Social Text 43:161-220.

Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2002. “Participation and Development: Perspective from Comprehensive Development Paradigm.” Review of Development Economics 6:163-182.

Sutcliffe, Bob. 2006. “Imperialisme Old and New: A Comment on David Harvey’s The New Imperialism and Ellen Meiksins Wood’s Empire of Capital.” Historical Materialism 14:59-78.

Tim Kordinasi PNPM Mandiri. 2014. Paket Informasi PNPM Mandiri 2014. Jakarta: Tim Kordinasi PNPM Mandiri.

Willis, Paul. 1981. “Cultural Production is Different from Cultural Reproduction is Different from Social Reproduction is Different from Reproduction.” Interchange, 12(2-3): 48 -67

Wong, Susan and Scott Guggenheim. 2005. “Community-Driven Development: Decentralization’s Accountability Challenge.” Pp. 253-267 in East Asia Decentralizes: Making Local Government Work, edited by T. W. Bank. Washington: The World Bank.

Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 2006. “Logics of Power: A Converation with David Harvey.” Historical Materialism 14:9-34.

World-Bank. 2001. “Promoting Good Governance with Social Funds and Decentralization.” PREM Notes Public Sector 51.

Zulminarni, Nani. 2009. ‘Change through Empowerment–The Journey of Indonesia Women Heads of Households.’ Project report presented at the PEKKA Workshop, held by the World Bank in Hotel Borobudur, Jakarta, June 2009.
CROSSMARK
Published
2018-08-19
DIMENSIONS
How to Cite
Rachman, N. F. (2018). Meninjau Kembali Teorisasi Mengenal Desentralisasi, Community Driven Delevopment, dan Kapitalisasi Agraria. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v4i1.213