Spatial Analysis of the Land Object of Agrarian Reform Redistribution Priorities for Supporting Low Carbon Development

  • Moefid Magfoedin Master Program in Environmental Resources Management and Development, PostGraduate School, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
  • Soemarno Soemarno Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
  • Dini Atikawati Postgraduate School, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

Abstract

Abstract: This study analyzes the spatial classification of redistribution priorities for Land Objects of Agrarian Reform (TORA) in Non-productive Convertible Production Forest (HPK Non-Productive) covering 14,310.42 hectares in Sintang Regency, West Kalimantan. The land was verified through the Inventory of Land Tenure, Ownership, Use, and Utilization (IP4T) in 2021 and proposed for forest release in 2022. The results of the study show the persistence of Dayak cultural traditions and reveal three key irregularities: landholdings exceeding the 5 ha TORA ceiling, multiple landholdings by single subjects, and the conversion of land to oil palm. Using a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative, qualitative, and spatial analysis with ArcGIS, the study identified three redistribution priorities: (1) fully eligible parcels (≈1.9%), (2) parcels under 5 ha requiring subject verification (≈26%), and (3) parcels over 5 ha, including forest-use and oil palm areas, requiring stricter screening and conflict resolution (≈71%). The LCDI-based analysis estimates 988,800 tC (3.63 million tCO₂e), with rubber plantations contributing >80%. The study recommends an inclusive TORA scheme that accommodates Dayak customary values by allocating communal forests (hutan ulayat, tana ulen, tana jaka) within each village. This supports forest cover preservation while aligning with the FOLU Net Sink policy, the Low Carbon Development Initiative (LCDI), and the oil palm moratorium, thereby reinforcing sustainable agrarian reform in forest boundary regions.

Keywords: Forest Boundary, Incremental Agrarian Arrangement, Low Carbon Development, Non-Productive HPK, TORA Redistribution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajung, F. (2023). Nilai-nilai religi dalam tradisi Beumao Dayak Ketunggau Sesaet (Sebuah tinjauan filosofis budaya). Balale’: Jurnal Antropologi, 4(1), 37–54.

Aldillah, R. (2020). Dynamics of the TORA Program at 2015–2019 Period in Indonesia Agricultural Development. Sustainability in Food and Agriculture (SFNA), 1(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.26480/sfna.01.2020.37.41

Angelsen, A. (1994). Shifting cultivation and "deforestation": A study from Sumatra, Indonesia. Bergen, Norway: Chr. Michelsen Institute. (Working Paper WP 1994: 1).

ANTARA. (2024, April 26). Moratorium sawit tetap berlaku, pemerintah lanjutkan evaluasi tata kelola. Diakses dari https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4037364/moratorium-sawit-tetap-berlaku-pemerintah-lanjutkan-evaluasi-tata-kelola.

Anugrah, N. (2021). Pemerintah kebut realisasi reforma agraria. Jakarta: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (KLHK). Retrieved on 25 November 2024 dari https://ppid.menlhk.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/6025/pemerintah-kebut-realisasi-reforma-agraria.

Badan Informasi Geospasial. (2020). Data Digital Elevation Model Nasional (DEMNAS). Pusat Pemetaan dan Integrasi Tematik. Cibinong.

Colchester, M., & Chao, S. (2011). Oil Palm Expansion in South East Asia: Trends and Implications for Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples. Forest Peoples Programme.

Cramb, R. (2011). Shifting Cultivation and Land Use in the Asia-Pacific Region. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.

Departemen Permukiman dan Prasarana Wilayah Direktorat Jenderal Penataan Ruang. (2003). Pedoman penyusunan rencana tata ruang wilayah kabupaten dan wilayah propinsi (Ed. ke-2, VO-77). PT Mediatama Saptakarya.

Direktorat Survei dan Pemetaan Tematik, Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional. (2021). Laporan Akhir Pekerjaan Peta Tematik Pertanahan dan Ruang dalam Rangka Percepatan Redistribusi Tanah Obyek Reforma Agraria dari Kawasan Hutan Berbasis Tata Ruang dan Lingkungan.Unpublished.

Dove, M. (1985). Swidden Agriculture in Indonesia: The Subsistence Strategies of the Kalimantan Kantu’. Mouton Publishers.

Eilenberg, M. (2012). At the Edges of States: Dynamics of State Formation in the Indonesian Borderlands. Brill.

Enemark, S. (2009). Land Administration Systems – Managing Rights, Restrictions and Responsibilities in Land. Map World Forum.

Guillaume, T., Murtilaksono, K., Kotowska, M. M., Hertel, D., Knohl, A., Krashevska, V., Scheu, S., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2018). Carbon costs and benefits of Indonesian rainforest conversion to plantations. Nature Communications, 9, 2388. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04755-y

Hardiyanto, I. (2021). Kebijakan moratorium sawit dan implementasinya dalam kerangka tata kelola perkebunan berkelanjutan. Jurnal Tata Ruang dan Agraria, 15(3), 102–118.

Hidayat, Y. (2018). Sistem perladangan berpindah sebagai local genius pada masyarakat Bukit di Pegunungan Meratus, Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Vidya Karya, 33(1), 82–91.

Horstmann, A. (2014). Ethnicization and Migration: New Forms of Nationalism in Southeast Asian Borderlands. Asian Ethnicity, 15(3), 292–309.

Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 62 Tahun 2023 tentang Reforma Agraria. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Indonesia.go.id. (2024). Delapan prioritas pembangunan agraria dan tata ruang. Diakses pada 25 November 2024 dari https://indonesia.go.id/kategori/editorial/8775/ delapan-prioritas-pembangunan-agraria-dan-tata-ruang?lang=1

Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2018). Instruksi Presiden Nomor 8 Tahun 2018 tentang Penundaan dan Evaluasi Perizinan Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit. Jakarta.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2003). Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2006). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. IPCC.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2019). 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC.

Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional. (2019). Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Kegiatan IP4T Tahun 2019. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Penataan Agraria.

Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional. (2021, Desember 29). Audiensi draft proposal: Perencanaan penggunaan dan pemanfaatan tanah lokasi HPK tidak produktif Provinsi Kalimantan Barat. Direktorat Jenderal Penataan Agraria.

Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional. (2023). Petunjuk teknis penataan akses reforma agraria tahun 2024 (No. 2/JUKNIS-500.TU.01.02/XII/2023). Direktorat Pemberdayaan Tanah Masyarakat, Direktorat Jenderal Penataan Agraria.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Nomor P.51/Menlhk/Setjen/KUM.1/6/2016 tentang Tata Cara Pelepasan Kawasan Hutan Produksi yang Dapat Dikonversi. Jakarta: KLHK.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2018). Keputusan Menteri LHK No. SK.608/MENLHK/SETJEN/PLA.2/12/2018 tentang Cadangan Kawasan Hutan Produksi yang Dapat Dikonversi Tidak Produktif sebagai Sumber TORA. Jakarta.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2018). Peraturan Menteri LHK Nomor 17 Tahun 2018 tentang Tata Cara Pelepasan Kawasan Hutan untuk Sumber TORA. Jakarta.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2020). Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Inventarisasi Gas Rumah Kaca Nasional (AFOLU). Direktorat Inventarisasi Gas Rumah Kaca.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2021). Rencana Operasional Indonesia’s FOLU Net Sink 2030. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Planologi Kehutanan dan Tata Lingkungan.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2022). Pedoman Umum Perhutanan Sosial. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan.

Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Bappenas. (2025). Strategi dan penahapan pembangunan rendah karbon dalam RPJPN 2025–2045: Upaya mencapai net zero emissions. Low Carbon Development Indonesia. https://lcdi-indonesia.id/uploads/2025/05/Strategi-dan-Penahapan-Pembangunan-Rendah-Karbon.pdf

Li, T. M. (2007). The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Duke University Press.

Li, T. M. (2014). Land’s End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier. Duke University Press.

Marhaento, H., Susanti, A., Permadi, D. B., Imron, M. A., Budiadi, Hermudananto, Nurjanto, H. H., & Susanto,

D. (2019). Jangka Benah: Konsep dan Implementasi Penyelesaian Keberadaan Kebun Kelapa Sawit Rakyat Monokultur Dalam Kawasan Hutan. Fakultas Kehutanan UGM. ISBN: 978-979-3178-19-6.

Mathilda, S. H., Pakpahan, B. J., & Tobing, S. H. L. (2021). Sistem ladang gilir balik sebagai ekoteologi masyarakat Dayak. Jurnal Berita Hidup, 4(1), 117–137. https://e-journal.sttberitahidup.ac.id/index.php/jbh

Maulina, A. Y. (2025). Traditional spatial structure of the Dayak Iban community in Kapuas Hulu Regency, West Kalimantan [Undergraduate thesis, IPB University]. Scientific Repository IPB University. (in Indonesian).

McCarthy, J. F. (2010). Processes of Inclusion and Adverse Incorporation: Oil Palm and Agrarian Change in Sumatra, Indonesia. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(4), 821–850.

MoEF. (2018). Indicative Map of Social Forestry and Agrarian Reform Objects. Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Indonesia.

Padoch, C., & Peluso, N. L. (1996). Borneo in Transition: People, Forests, Conservation, and Development. Oxford University Press.

Sellato, B. (2001). Forest, Resources and People in Bulungan: Elements for a History of Settlement, Trade and Social Dynamics in Borneo, 1880–2000. CIFOR.

World Bank. (2019). Indonesia Sustainable Landscapes Management Program. Washington, DC: World Bank.

CROSSMARK
Published
2025-12-18
DIMENSIONS
How to Cite
Magfoedin, M., Soemarno, S., & Atikawati, D. (2025). Spatial Analysis of the Land Object of Agrarian Reform Redistribution Priorities for Supporting Low Carbon Development . BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 11(2), 138–161. https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v11i2.848