Ancaman Keberfungsian Sosial Pada Masyarakat di Dalam Kawasan Konservasi: Studi Kasus Desa Ranupani di Taman Nasional Bromo Tengger Semeru

  • Versanudin Hekmatyar Politeknik Kesejahteraan Sosial Bandung
  • Anggiana Ginanjar Adinugraha FORCI Development
Keywords: Social functioning, Access, National Parks, Bromo Tengger Semeru, Ranupani Village

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this study is to describing the social functioning of the community in the Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park area. Qualitative approach was used to collect the data to be descriptively presented. Social functioning is an important field of life quality measures related to the fulfillment of basic needs. The results show that the threat of social functioning in the Ranupani Village community was influenced by (1) the ability of the community to meet basic needs, (2) the ability to carry out social roles, (3) the adaptability of the community in facing changes, and (4) the integration capabilities in social systems. In the end, community as the main actor will try to maintain and improve its position and role by constructing and acting to reproduce the position in that social environment.

Keywords: Social functioning, Access, National Parks, Bromo Tengger Semeru, Ranupani Village

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Versanudin Hekmatyar, Politeknik Kesejahteraan Sosial Bandung

Politeknik Kesejahteraan Sosial Bandung

References

  • Bryant, R. L. (1998). Power, knowledge and political ecology in the third world: a review. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 22(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339802200104
  • Cahyono, S. A., & Lastiantoro, C. Y. (2019). Konflik Tenurial di Taman Nasional Meru Betiri. In S. Ekawati, D. Suharjito, & S. Anwar (Ed.), Merangkai Esai Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Hutan Konservasi ( 57–78). PT. Kanisius.
  • Corcoran, K. J., & Roberts, A. R. (2015). Social workers’ desk reference. In Oxford University Press. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  • Desa Ranupani. (2016). Profil Desa Ranupani Tahun 2016.
  • Dunggio, I., & Gunawan, H. (2009). Telaah Sejarah Kebijakan Pengelolaan Taman Nasional di Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 6(1), 43–56.
  • Ekawati, S. (2019). Model-Model Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Hutan Konservasi. In S. Ekawati, D. Suharjito, & S. Anwar (Ed.), Merangkai Esai Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Hutan Konservasi (hal. 25–42). PT. Kanisius.
  • Geertz, C. (2016). Involusi Pertanian: Proses Perubahan Ekologi di Indonesia. Komunitas Bambu.
  • Germain, C., & Knight, C. (2021). The life model of social work practice. Columbia University Press.
  • Gitterman, A., & Germain, C. B. (2008). The life model of social work practice: Advances in theory and practice. Columbia University Press.
  • Goldman, M. J., Davis, A., & Little, J. (2016). Controlling land they call their own: access and women’s empowerment in Northern Tanzania. Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(4), 777–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2015.1130701.
  • Harker, R., Mahar, C., & Wilkes, C. (2009). Posisi teoritis dasar. In R. Harker, C. Mahar, & C. Wilkes (Ed.), (Habitus x modal) + Ranah = Praktik, Pengantar Paling Komprehensif kepada Pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu. Jalasutra.
  • Hekmatyar, V., & Nugroho, F. (2018). Pola Penguasaan Tanah dan Distribusi Kesejahteraan Rumah Tangga di Pedesaan Jawa Timur. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 4(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v4i1.222.
  • Johnson, D. P. (1986). Teori Sosiologi Klasik Dan Modern, jilid 2, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.
  • Li, T. M. (2012). The will to improve: perencanaan, kekuasaan, dan pembangunan di indonesia. Marjin Kiri.
  • Mahmud, A., Satria, A., & Kinseng, R. A. (2016). Zonasi Konservasi untuk Siapa? Pengaturan Perairan Laut Taman Nasional Bali Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 18(3), 237. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.13141.
  • Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place, and Gender (NED-New). University of Minnesota Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttttw2z.
  • Midgley, J. (2013). Social Development: Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Mutea, E., Rist, S., & Jacobi, J. (2020). Applying the theory of access to food security among smallholder family farmers around North-West Mount Kenya. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051751.
  • Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson.
  • Nurrochmat, D. R., Darusman, D., & Ruchjadi, D. (2014). Rekonstruksi sistem tenurial kehutanan. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan, 1(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v1i1.10275.
  • Ostrom, E. (2002). Chapter 24 Common-pool resources and institutions: Toward a revised theory. In Handbook of Agricultural Economics (Vol. 2, hal. 1315–1339). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(02)10006-5.
  • Peluso, N. L. (2006). Hutan kaya, rakyat melarat: Penguasaan sumber daya dan perlawanan di Jawa. Khopalindo.
  • Peluso, N. L., & Lund, C. (2011). New frontiers of land control: Introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.607692.
  • Probosiwi, R. (2018). Keberfungsian sosial masyarakat di daerah rawan konflik di Kabupaten Lumajang. Sosio Konsepsia, 8(01), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v8i1.1488.
  • Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 28 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pengelolaan Kawasan Suaka Alam Dan Kawasan Pelestarian Alam, (2015).
  • Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1990 Tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya, (1990).
  • Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 tahun 2019 Tentang Pekerja Sosial, (2019).
  • Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A Theory of Access. Rural Sociology, 68(2), 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x
  • Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2016). Research Methods for Social Work. Cengage Learning.
  • Scoones, I. (2015). Sustainable livelihoods and rural development. Practical Action Publishing.
  • Soemarwoto, O. (2004). Ekologi, lingkungan hidup dan pembangunan. Djambatan.
  • Steward, J. H. (1972). Theory of culture change: The methodology of multilinear evolution. University of Illinois Press.
  • Sylviani, & Hakim, I. (2014). Analisis Tenurial Dalam Pengembangan Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH): Studi Kasus Kph Gedong Wani, Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 11(4), 29125. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2014.11.4.14.
  • Takwin, B. (2009). Proyek intelektual Pierre Bourdieu: melacak asal-usul masyarakat, melampaui oposisi biner dalam ilmu sosial. In R. Harker, C. Mahar, & C. Wilkes (Ed.), (Habitus x modal) + Ranah = Praktik, Pengantar Paling Komprehensif kepada Pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu. Jalasutra.
  • Williams, J. B. V., Karls, J. M., & Wandrei, K. (1989). The person-in-environment (PIE) system for describing problems of social functioning. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 40(11), 1125–1127. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.40.11.1125
  • CROSSMARK
    Published
    2021-06-14
    DIMENSIONS