Make the Cities Work: Some Stories of Smart City Initiatives Around the Globe
Keywords:smart city, public participation, sustainable livelihood
AbstractThe concept of Smart City (SC) has been popular recently, and has been adopted by many cities in the world with various implementation and development. As the world most population now concentrates on urban area, a sustainable city planning and management become important. As the population keeps growing,pressure and tension on a city arise: space for living, waste management, traffic congestion, sufficient clean water resources, and other issues. Beginning in around 2009, the concept of SC was designed to solve problems related to city growth in a sustainable manner. By using technology, Internet of Things (IoT), and community participation, SC aims to make the city a livable place for its inhabitants, putting people as the center of interest and in quality of life in sustainable manners as ultimate goal. This paper aimed to deliver a study on the trend of SC adopted by two cities: Amsterdam and Jakarta. The study was conducted through literature review. The data were analyzed to compare the concept of SC in each city from different parameters, focusing on the developmentprocess, technological adoption, political and institutional arrangement and implementation. The results show that each city has specif ic strategy to implement SC, based on their economic, social, environment and demographic characteristics. It is also important to underline that the main concept of SC is to attract related stakeholders in taking charge of their roles for the success of SC. Furthermore, both cities has a sharing vision in putting environment as the main framework of the development of SC.
Amsterdam Smart City 2019, No Title.
Anthopoulos, LG 2015, ‘Understanding the smart city domain: a literature review’, Transforming city governments for successful smart cities, Springer, Manhattan, NYC, pp. 9–21.
Buhaug, H and Urdal, H 2013, ‘An urbanization bomb? Population growth and social disorder in cities’, Global Environmental Change, Elsevier, 23(1), pp. 1–10.
Cosgrave, E, Arbuthnot, K and Tryfonas, T 2013, ‘Living labs, innovation districts and information marketplaces: a systems approach for smart cities’, Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier, 16, pp. 668–677.
Dameri, RP 2013, ‘Searching for smart city definition: a comprehensive proposal’, International Journal of Computers & Technology, 11(5), pp. 2544–2551.
Dameri, RP 2017, ‘Smart city definition, goals and performance’, Smart City Implementation, Springer, Manhattan, NYC, pp. 1–22.
Dociu, M and Dunarintu, A 2012, ‘The socio-economic impact of urbanization’, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, 2(1), pp. 47–52.
Hoornweg, D, Bhada-Tata, P and Kennedy, C 2013, ‘Environment: waste production must peak this century’, Nature News, 502(7473), p. 615.
‘Jakarta runs against time to build first waste-to-energy project’, The Jakarta Post 2018, accessed 31 August 2019, https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2018/12/20/jakarta-runs-against-time-to-build-first-waste-to-energy-project.html.
Letaifa, S Ben (2015) ‘How to strategize smart cities: revealing the SMART model’, Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, 68(7), pp. 1414–1419.
Madlener, R and Sunak, Y 2011, ‘Impacts of urbanization on urban structures and energy demand: What can we learn for urban energy planning and urbanization management?’, Sustainable Cities and Society, Elsevier, 1(1), pp. 45–53.
McKenzie, K 2008, ‘Urbanization, social capital and mental health’, Global Social Policy, SAGE, London, 8(3), pp. 359–377.
Mulia, K 2017, ‘Connecting Jakarta’, NOW! JAKARTA, accessed 31 August 2019, https://nowjakarta.co.id/updates/news/connecting-jakarta.
Neirotti, P et al. 2014, ‘Current trends in smart city initiatives: some stylised facts’, Cities, Elsevier, 38, pp. 25–36, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010.
Novianti, K and Syahid, CN 2017, ‘TOWARDS SMART CITY?: LESSONS FROM THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SMART CITY’S CONCEPT IN JAKARTA AND SURABAYA, Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI), Jakarta, April 2016, pp. 1–8.
Putri, DA, Ch, MK and Tanaya, J 2016, ‘From smart city to open city: Lessons from Jakarta Smart City’.
Santamouris, M et al. 2001, ‘On the impact of urban climate on the energy consumption of buildings’, Solar Energy, Elsevier, 70(3), pp. 201–216.
Uttara, S, Bhuvandas, N and Aggarwal, V 2012, ‘Impacts of urbanization on environment’, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2(2), pp. 1637–1645.
Ziadi, AR, Yossomsakdi, S and Wijaya, AF 2016, ‘The Implementation of E-Government (Smart City Program) to Achieve an Effective Public Service (Case Studies on Qlue and CROP in Management Unit of Jakarta Smart City)’, International Conference on Ethics of Business, Economics, and Social Science, pp. 434–440.
- All articles published in Jurnal Bhumi are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
- Copyright of the article remains with the author(s) without time limit. Jurnal Bhumi holds the license for first publication only.
- Author(s) can submit other contract as separate addition related to published articles, such as: uploading to institutional repository, publishing in book or other media with recognition and addressing initial publisher as Jurnal Bhumi.
- All parties are free to quote, copy, and adapt any article in Jurnal Bhumi for any legitimate purpose in any media, with the requirement to include credit for original author(s) and Jurnal Bhumi as first publisher.